Why McDonald's, Starbucks and other American brands continue to pay the price of politics in the Middle East
Por um escritor misterioso
Descrição
RIYADH: Whenever conflicts erupt in the Middle East, American consumer brands are often among the first targets of public anger. The war in Gaza has been no different, with McDonald’s and Starbucks branches in Lebanon attacked and consumer boycotts announced throughout the region. These attacks and boycotts echo similar scenes from the time of the Second Intifada in the early 2000s and the Iraq War era, which prompted a ban on Coca-Cola that remained in place in many Arab countries for decades, giving its rival Pepsi a market advantage enjoyed to this day.
Why thousands of restaurants are open, but you're not allowed
Even more stores? Not a tall order for Starbucks
Starbucks denies claims that it's banning Pride displays but union
Companies from Starbucks to McDonald's face controversy amid
McDonald's Saudi Arabia donates $533,000 to Gaza relief efforts
How Brands Can Swim Against the Inflation Stream
Companies from Starbucks to McDonald's face controversy amid
Starbucks and McDonald's maintain dominance as the world's most
Fact-Check: Has Pepsi modified its Product Design to support
As Starbucks unionizing slows, some strike, others skeptical
Mcdo starbucks kfc burger king supports israel｜TikTok Search
Demands Grow to Boycott Starbucks Amid Lawsuits Over Its Union's
Coca-Cola out, Egyptian soda in as anti-Western boycott sweeps
Children as young as eight picked coffee beans on farms supplying
de
por adulto (o preço varia de acordo com o tamanho do grupo)
/i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_bc8228b6673f488aa253bbcb03c80ec5/internal_photos/bs/2019/K/o/L3WTh1Rz6zI3eHagvqGA/free-fire-pro-league-2019.jpg)